電子期刊 |
ISSN:1684-193X
|
Updated
Oct 30, 2003
|
|
Contents:
Volume 2, Supplement 1; October, 2003 |
|
|
Chien-Chih Chen, MD; Tzong-Luen Wang, MD, PhD |
From the Department of Emergency Medicine (Chen
CC, Wang TL), Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital.
Correspondence to Dr. Tzong-Luen Wang, Department
of Emergency Medicine, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, 95
Wen Chang Road, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail M002183@ms.skh.org.tw
|
Abstract
|
|
|
The continued proliferation
of nuclear materials and technology make nuclear terrorism more
probable than ever. After the attacks of September 11, 2001 in United States
of America,
the whole world was under the shadow of nuclear terrorism. A radiological
terrorist attack on the Taiwan is a possibility. It could involve the dispersal of radioactive material
by deployment of a radiation dispersal device, an attack on a nuclear
power plant or detonation of a nuclear weapon. But the possibility
of latter is less likely. To decrease the vulnerability to the threat
of radiological terrorism, the assessment of risk and the medical
teams should have a basic understanding of radiation hazards and
medical management. They should be prepared to interact with appropriate
government agencies to facilitate the employment of emergency response
plans.
Key words--- Radiation Dispersal Device; Radiological Terrorism; Medical Teams |
|
|
History
of Radiation Incidents |
|
|
|
Three Mile
Island, Pennsylvania on March 28, 1979, equipment
malfunction compounded by human error led to the worst commercial
nuclear accident in U.S. That catastrophe
resulted in nuclear industry reform and a
antinuclear movement burgeon. Chernobyl reactor accident on April
26, 1986 is now known to have exposed more than 116,500 persons
and resulted in at least 28 deaths from acute radiation sickness.1,2
September 30,1999, technicians at a nuclear fuel reprocessing
plant in Japan accidentally set off a series of uncontrolled chain
reactions and released radiation by pouring too much uranium solution
into a holding tank. Despite the best medical care, two technicians
eventually died from the exposure.3 According to the record of radiation accidents
under Radiation Emergency Assistance Center-Training Site (REACTS),4
the number of radiation accidents has reached 403 with 133,617
victims, of which 2,965 had significant exposures and 120 persons
died in the world since 1994 to 2002 June.
As these emergencies illustrate,
significant health risks are associated with exposure to ionizing
radiation and radioactive contamination from nuclear accidents.
The fears related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and now
nuclear terrorism have also had significant adverse psychological effects. Without
question, any large-scale release of radioactive material into
the environment, whether accidental or intentional, has long-range
and complex effect.
|
|
|
Possible Types of Attacks |
|
While the end of the Cold War
has drastically reduced the likelihood of nuclear warfare, the
continued proliferation of nuclear materials and technology make
nuclear terrorism more probable than ever.5
The types of radiological terrorist attacks
could occur as follows. |
|
|
|
Radiological
dispersal events |
Deployment
of a radiation dispersal device (RDD) is a device used to disperse
radioactive materials without a nuclear detonation is called a radiation
dispersal device (RDD) or dirty bomb. RDDs
employ conventional explosives or other mechanisms to disperse
radioactive materials.
The second possibility is attack on a nuclear facility. Small or
highly localized larger amounts of radioactivity may be dispersed
with an bomb or other attacks to cause
fear and social disruption. Small radioactive sources, such as those
used in common medical applications, could be placed in a small
container and dispersed by bomb or moving vehicle. Individual exposure
would be low. The effects would be primarily psychosocial, with
no immediate health effects and a small risk of long-term adverse
health effects. Industrial sources contain higher quantities of
radioactive materials than those found in medical settings. Powerful
explosives in a nuclear facility could spread large quantities of
radioisotopes over a large area. Many of the injured would be contaminated
by radiation. Life-threatening injuries could result from both the
explosive event and radiation exposure. The area of dispersion depends
on the amount of explosive, atmospheric conditions, and adherence
of radioactive material to dust and other dispersed materials. Finely
dispersed particles or metal debris could cause ground contamination
and adhere to structural surfaces. The psychosocial effects would
be tremendous. Commercial nuclear reactors contain large quantities
of radioactive materials, but are very well protected. In
the unlikely event of a successful attack on a nuclear reactor resulting
in there release of radiation. Other potential targets, such
as spent fuel storage depots, nuclear-fuel reprocessing facilities,
transport vehicles, or high-level waste sites contain much less
radioactive material than do reactors.6 |
|
Nuclear
weapons |
|
A nuclear bomb constructed by a terrorist organization would
probably be a single device with a low yield of 0.01 to 10 kilotons
(kt). A more sophisticated, compact,
higher yield device, with a yield of 10 kt or higher, might be acquired by buying or stealing a stockpiled
nuclear weapon. So deployment of a nuclear weapon is much less
likely than a radiation dispersal event. The effects of the detonation
of a high-yield device include:
1.
Air blast is a shock wave of air
that travels outward from the point of explosion and is associated
with strong winds that cause personal injuries and structural
damage. Injuries and fatalities can be caused directly by the
blast and indirectly by air-borne objects and falling debris.
2.
Heat results from the fireball
generated by a nuclear explosion. It is extremely hot, igniting
materials and projecting heat over long distances, causing thermal
burns.
3.
Intense light
can damage to eyesight and cause temporary
or permanent blindness.
4.
Ionizing radiation
can cause acute radiation syndrome of different degrees of severity. Initial
radiation is from the initial intense pulse of radiation produced in the first
minute following detonation. It includes gamma rays and neutrons.
Residual radiation results
from radioactive decay after the first minute following detonation.
Large amounts of radioactive materials are propelled into the
atmosphere, contributing to radioactive fallout. Radiation injuries
are the predominant cause of death in lower-yield detonations.
5.
Ground shock
can cause extensive damage to structures
and infrastructure.6
The destruction of structures and infrastructure
can cause damage of people.
|
|
|
|
The
Potential Impact of a Major Nuclear Attack |
|
According to the CATS (Consequences
Assessment Tool Set) software created by the US Federal Emergency
Management Agency and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the expected
casualties from a 12.5 kiloton nuclear explosion at ground level in
New York
City was calculated.
The blast and thermal effects of such an explosion would kill 52,000
people immediately, and direct radiation would cause 44,000 cases
of radiation sickness, of which 10,000 would be fatal. Radiation
from fallout would kill another 200,000 people and cause several
hundred thousand additional cases of radiation sickness.7
Casualties on this scale would immediately overwhelm medical facilities
leading to a high mortality rate among those injured but not killed
by the initial blast and thermal effects. Over 1000 hospital beds
would be destroyed by blast, and 8700 beds would be in areas with
radiation exposures high enough to cause radiation sickness.7 The remaining local medical
facilities would quickly be overwhelmed, and the advance outside
help would be delayed. For example, after the 1995 earthquake in
Kobe, Japan, in which
6500 died and 34900 were injured, there were long delays before
outside medical assistance arrived,8
and this disaster had few of the complicating factors that would
accompany a nuclear attack with extensive radioactive contamination.
|
|
|
|
Types
of Radiation and the Damage |
|
Ionizing radiation can produce
charged particles (ions) in any material it strikes. X-rays, for
example, are a form of ionizing radiation. At high doses, these
charged particles can cause damage to molecules, cells, or tissue.
Although different types of nuclear weapons or materials will emit
various kinds of radiation, alpha, beta particles, gamma rays and
neutrons are the types most likely to be encountered after a nuclear
terrorist attack. Alpha particles are large, heavy, charged particles
containing two protons and two neutrons. The ability of penetrate
is poor, causing minimal external radiation. Beta particles are
small, light, charged particles found in radioactive fallout. The
ability of penetrate is fair, causing similar to thermal burns.
Gamma rays are uncharged, highly energetic photons similar to X-rays.
The ability of penetrate is high, causing whole-body exposure. Neutrons
are uncharged particles with virtually the same mass as a proton.
They are emitted during nuclear detonations, but are not present
in fallout. Due to their mass, they can cause significant biological
damage---up to twenty times the damage caused by gamma ray. The
effects of radiation depend on whether the patient was exposed or
contaminated, and if contaminated, how much radiation the patient
has absorbed.
The effects that radiation depends on how much radiation the contaminated
patient has absorbed. This amount of absorbed radiation used to
be measured in rads-radiation absorbed
doses. It's now measured by the gray (Gy).
One Gy equals 100 rads.
Patients who absorb less than 0.75 Gy
are not likely to experience any symptoms of exposure. Those who
absorb more than 0.75 Gy can develop acute
radiation syndrome.(ARS)(9) A dose of 30
Gy or more is always fatal.9
|
|
|
|
Tentative
Assessment of the Risk of Radiological Terrorism |
|
The assessment of the risk itself,
consisting in interpreting the product of the probability of occurrence
with the effects, is important. It is not an easy case, because
quite different quantities have to be multiplied. The risk assessment
of radiological terrorism shown in Table.10
Despite the fact that the damage of a successful nuclear weapon
would be disastrous, the risk is extremely low probability. Although
still difficult and a high-tech-business to RDD or dirty bomb, radiological
terrorism is incomparably more feasible than the other cases. The
scale of possible effects is lower, but the effects on the economics
could be extremely large, and the psychological effects on the public
would in any case be huge indeed.10 |
|
|
|
|
Table . Qualitative assessment of the risk of
radiological terrorism |
|
Governmental Response to Radiological
Terrorism |
In America |
The Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan (FRERP) set up an organized
and integrated capability for timely, coordinated response by federal
agencies to peacetime radiological emergencies.
FRERP covers any peacetime radiological emergencies
that has actual, potential, or perceived radiological
consequences within the United
States that could require
a response by the federal government. The level of response is based
on the type and quantity of radioactive material, the location of
the emergency, the impact on the public and the environment, and
the size of the affected area.
When the terrorists start the radiological terrorism, the Atomic
Energy Act directs the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to
investigate all alleged or suspected criminal violations of the
act. In addition, the FBI is legally responsible for locating any
nuclear weapon, device, or material and for restoring nuclear facilities
to their rightful custodians. So, the FBI would be the lead federal
agency for any terrorist event, and all other federal agencies would
provide technical support and assistance to the FBI. The federal
response would be adapted to the specific circumstances of the event.
Agencies supporting the FBI include the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Energy (DOE),
the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice,
the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). Each supportive agency would coordinate
and manage their technical portion of the response, and implement
measures to protect public health and safety. The FBI would manage
and direct law enforcement and intelligence aspects of the response,
coordinating activities with appropriate federal, state, and local
agencies within the framework of FRERP and as provided for in established
interagency agreements or plans.6 |
|
In Taiwan |
|
When the terrorists start the radiological terrorism, the National
Security Bureau (NSB) is authorized to convene Coordination Meeting
for National Security Intelligence (CMNSI) to directs
the Bureau of Investigation, Ministry of Justice and National police
Administration, Ministry of Interior to investigate all alleged
or suspected criminal violation of the act.
The Atomic Energy Council (AEC) of the Republic of China promulgated
a nuclear emergency response plan in November 1981 under the approval
of the Executive Yuan. The national nuclear Emergency management
Committee (NNEMC) was also established. Efforts of all government
authorities concerned have been integrated to organize a systematic
arrangement for the nuclear emergency response plan. The responsibility
of nuclear emergency planning and implementing are demarcated according
to the site boundary. Taiwan Power Company is responsible for on-site
areas under the supervision of the AEC. Central and local government
agencies are responsible for off-site areas with the supports of
TPC. This off-site nuclear organization is referred to as the NNEMC
which comprises all government authorities concerned. NNEMC reports
to the Executive Yuan and makes decisions on public protection actions,
directs and coordinates the supporting center as well as the rescue
center. The directing and coordinating center is composed of AEC
and TPC personnel and subdivided into technical group, radiation
monitoring team and logistic group with the responsibility of collecting
and submitting accident information, assessing the accident consequences
and dosage, monitoring and controlling off-site radiation and contamination,
respectively. The rescue center is composed of relevant units of
the local governments that is responsible
for notifying and helping the public to take protective actions,
arranging accommodations and providing medical care. The supporting
center is composed of military units which are responsible for providing
transportation means, carrying out decontamination in affected areas,
and establishing temporal communication networks, traffic control
and safeguard. |
|
Conclusion |
|
The
continued proliferation of nuclear materials and technology make
nuclear terrorism more probable than ever. The attacks of September
11, 2001 in United States of America
have provided a wake-up call for facing the threat of nuclear terrorism.
In addition to vigilance and preventive measures, preparation is
needed for a prompt and effective response in the event of a terrorist
attack involving radiation. Government agencies have well-defined
roles and responsibilities in the event of a nuclear emergency.
The medical teams must be prepared to participate as part of a team
effort to mitigate the effects of radiological terrorism. |
|
|
|
References |
|
|
1. |
Geiger HJ. The accident at Chernobyl and the medical response. JAMA
1986; 256: 609-12 |
|
2. |
Linnemann RE. Soviet medical response to Chernobyl nuclear accident. JAMA 1987;258:
637-43 |
|
3. |
Ryan
M. The Tokaimura accident: nuclear energy
and reactor safety. 2001. http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/tokaimura/tokaimura.html |
|
4. |
Radiation Emergency Assistance
Center/Training SiteIREAC/TS). Available
at : URL: http://www.orau.gov/reacts |
|
5. |
Jarrett, D. G.(Ed).
“medical management of radiological casualties
handbook(1st ed).” 1999 |
|
6. |
Julie K. CME Article Radiological terrorism.
NJM 2003;100:14-22 |
|
7. |
Land C. Studies of cancer
and radiation dose among atomic bomb survivors: the example of breast
cancer. JAMA. 1995;274:402-7 |
|
8. |
Tanaka K. The Kobe earthquake: the system response: a disaster
report from Japan. Eur J Emergency Med 1996;3:263-9 |
|
9. |
Oka Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Radiation Emergency Assistance
Center/Training Site.”Radiation injury”
Guidance for radiation accident management. 2001 |
|
10. |
Bernard A. Assessing the risk of radiological terrorism: How real is
the threat? CBMTS IV Spiez, Switzerland April 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
. |
|
|
. |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|