Annals of Disaster Medicine
| ISSN:1684-193X
| Updated July 10, 2002
|
Contents:
June 2002 Vol. 1,
Num. 1 | Composition
of Disaster Medical Assistance Team Personnel in Taiwan: Comparison with USA
System | Tzong-Luen
Wang, MD, PhD; Hsiu-Ching Hsu; Hang Chang, MD, PhD |
|
Abstract---The purpose of this
study is also attempting to find out the adequacy of DMAT composition and to help
further modification of DMAT set-up. With the preliminary data in this registry,
we tried to analyze the composition of these DMAT personnel and make comparisons
between them and the available data from nine DMATs in United States. A multivariate
analysis model revealed that: total DMAT members (in USA) = 0.74 x (Number of
Physicians) - 21.15 x (Number of Nurses) - 21.04 x (Number of Paramedics) - 8.96
x (Number of EMT) - 101.67 x (Number of Pharmacists) + 346.92 x (Number of Respiratory
Therapists) + 58.03 x (Number of Psychological Consultants) + 13.94 x (Number
of Other Categories) - 33.09. The variations of the other two teams are less than
170. In contrast, the multivariate analysis model revealed: total DMAT members
(in Taiwan) = 44.07 x (Number of Physicians) - 6.28 x (Number of Nurses) + 3.66
x (Number of EMT) + 1.72 x (Others) - 1425.6. The variations of other teams ranged
from -375.1 to -1075.86. The paramedics or EMT account for more than 50% of DMAT
personnel in USA whereas they comprise only 6.4% in Taiwan (p<0.001). In conclusion,
there are no consistencies in the compositions among different DMAT personnel
in Taiwan. The establishment of uniform policies and overall planning may be the
only method resolving this problem. (Ann. Disaster Med 2002;1:11-19) |
Key words---DMAT; disasters; paramedics |
|