Cheuk-Sing Choy, MD; Tzong-Luen Wang, MD, PhD; Hang Chang, MD, PhD
|
Abstract
--Although Taipei City government has requested the emergency response hospitals to implement
Hospital Emergency Incident Command System (HEICS) since 2002, the
initial evaluation revealed inadequate results last year. After SARS endemics,
we re-evaluated the response plans provided by these hospitals to evaluate if the HEICS has
been implemented. Of the 53 plans, there were about 51 (96%) that
had predictable chain of management, and the average score was 79
points. As to accountability of position function, there were more
plans meeting with the criteria than last year (58% v 19%, P<0.01),
as the average score was (68+5 v 45+10, P<0.01). There were also more hospitals (n=31; 58% v 13%, P<0.01) containing flexible organizational
chart that allowed flexible response, improved documentation of
facility and common language to facilitate outside assistance. The
individual scores were also significantly higher than last year.
Twenty-four hospitals fulfilled the requirements of prioritized
response checklists, cost effective emergency planning within health
care corporations, and complete governmental requirements. The scores
were thus 64, 66 and 64 respectively. The average score was significantly
higher in tertiary center than in other hospitals (88+9 vs.
56+12, P<0.001). In summary, there is a trend that
the hospitals implemented HEICS into their response plans spontaneously
after SARS endemics. It may imply that HEICS can be a good model
for disaster response. |